Cases 1 - 10 of 32
DE LATORRE, M.D. v. SANDERS, et. al.
as 1:2024cv02776
Defendant:
Tommy Tuberville, in his capacity as a member of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the United States Senate, Susan M. Collins, in her capacity as a member of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the United States Senate, John W. Hickenlooper, in his capacity as member of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the United States Senate and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph De La Torre, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Jennifer Quan, et al
as 23-35354
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JENNIFER QUAN, in her official capacity as Regional Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, JANET COIT, in her official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
ALASKA TROLLERS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
ALASKA CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION, (U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski and U.S. Congresswoman Mary Sattler Peltola) and SOUTHEAST ALASKA TRIBAL COALITION
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Alaska Trollers Association, et al
as 23-35323
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant:
JENNIFER QUAN, in her official capacity as Regional Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
ALASKA TROLLERS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
ALASKA CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION, (U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski and U.S. Congresswoman Mary Sattler Peltola) and SOUTHEAST ALASKA TRIBAL COALITION
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Jennifer Quan, et al
as 23-35324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER QUAN, in her official capacity as Regional Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA TROLLERS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
ALASKA CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION, (U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski and U.S. Congresswoman Mary Sattler Peltola) and SOUTHEAST ALASKA TRIBAL COALITION
Wild Fish Conservancy v. State of Alaska, et al
as 23-35322
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant:
JENNIFER QUAN, in her official capacity as Regional Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
ALASKA TROLLERS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
ALASKA CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION, (U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski and U.S. Congresswoman Mary Sattler Peltola) and SOUTHEAST ALASKA TRIBAL COALITION
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae:
Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, Alaska Wilderness League, Environment America and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish And Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alaska State Chamber of Commerce, Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Kirk Medak v. State of Alaska, et al
as 23-35118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK MEDAK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA, MICHELLE HIGUCHI, Judge and LISA MURKOWSKI, Senator, U.S. Congress
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
