Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lisle v. Hughes et al
as 1:2026cv01352
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Perez, . Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Lisle, Jr. v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 26-2087
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. LISLE, JR.
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES and MINDI NURSE
Hayden v. Watford et al
as 2:2026cv00746
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden, MD
Defendant:
Ernest Deandre Watford, IV, Kardareous Monteniz Gillis, Lisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliot v. Lisle et al
as 5:2026cv02376
Plaintiff:
J.D. Elliot
Defendant:
Dwight Eric Lisle, Alexandria Noelle Allen, Michael P. Hodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawver v. Napier
as 9:2026cv00741
Petitioner:
Curtis Lisle Shawver
Respondent:
Warden Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wewel v. HTS Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00490
Plaintiff:
Todd Wewel
Defendant:
HTS Logistics, Inc., Lisle Truck Leasing and Fritz Pierre Louis
Intervenor:
Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lisle v. Hughes et al
as 1:2025cv01389
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes and Mindi Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisle v. Nurse
as 1:2025cv01338
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steerman et al v. Vail Clinic Inc et al
as 1:2025cv02518
Plaintiff:
Mary Steerman and Michael Steerman
Defendant:
Vail Clinic, Inc. doing business as Vail Health Hospital, Barry T. Hammaker and Turner C. Lisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Zayed v. Village of Lisle
as 1:2025cv09386
Plaintiff:
Marwan Zayed
Defendant:
Village of Lisle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
