Cases
Sall v. George
as 23-1188
Plaintiff / Appellant: Abdullah Sall
Defendant / Appellee: Sarah Fair George, Da Capo Publishing, Inc, Chittenden County Police Department, AKA Burlington Police Department, AKA Winooski Police Department, AKA Colchester Police Department, AKA Milton Police Department, AKA Essex Police Department, AKA Shelburne Police Department, AKA Hinesburg Police and others
Pan v. Local Motion MN, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv03169
Counter Defendant: Yue Pan
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Local Motion MN, LLC and Local Motion Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Local Motion Minnesota, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: David Seeley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Sall v. George et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00214
Defendant: Sarah Fair George, Da Capo Publishing Inc, Chittenden County Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Abdullah Sall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Local Motion OC, LLC
as 8:2017cv00052
Defendant: DOES and Local Motion OC, LLC
Plaintiff: Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC et al v. Morel Sand, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv07488
Defendant: Does, Living S and G, Inc., Local Motion OC, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11916
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tadayon et al v. Local Motion, Inc.
as 1:2012cv12113
Plaintiff: Saied Tadayon and Bijan Tadayon
Defendant: Local Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Egan v. Local Motion Entertainment Inc
as 1:2008cv04182
Plaintiff: Russell Egan
Defendant: Local Motion Entertainment Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?