Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pierre v. Goodwin
as 26-30061
Plaintiff:
Delis Pierre
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, James LeBlanc, Seth Smith and others
Pierre v. Goodwin
as 25-30643
Plaintiff:
Delis Pierre
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, James LeBlanc, Seth Smith and others
Abasolo et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11981
Plaintiff:
Paula Abasolo, Jody Albert, George Andel and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Van Nortrick v. Dauzat et al
as 5:2025cv00535
Plaintiff:
Roy Van Nortrick
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat, Linda Bunch, Medical Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2021cv03727
Plaintiff:
Alex Matthew Hammond
Defendant:
Louis Hamilton, Bruce Young, Vincent Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2020cv01529
Plaintiff:
Delis B Pierre, Kid, JarHead and others
Defendant:
Linda Camille Bunch, Vincent Coleman, Bruce Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2019cv01214
Defendant:
Bruce Solomon, Sandra Robinson, Pamela Hearn and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Solomon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Walker Methodist Foundation et al
as 0:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Hamilton and Lisa Louis Hamilton-Clark
Defendant:
Walker Methodist Foundation and Walker Methodist Health Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Danny McCadney v. Louis Hamilton
as 16-30572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY MCCADNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS HAMILTON, Sergent
McCadney v. Hamilton
as 3:2013cv00824
Defendant:
Louis Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Danny McCadney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
