Cases 1 - 10 of 462
Luckett v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Tempestt Luckett
Defendant:
Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
William Cope, Jr. v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, et al
as 24-5496
Defendant:
JESSE COOMBS, Captain, I. MORRALLES, Lieutenant, LUTHER LUCKETT CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, et al. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS COPE, JR.
Robert Luckett v. Officer Cramer, et al
as 24-1835
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LUCKETT
Defendant:
OFFICER CRAMER and OFFICER EDDELMON
Tolliver (PS) et al v. Kardashian West et al
as 1:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver and Danny Tolliver
Defendant:
Kim Kardashian West, Kylie Jenner, Latoya Luckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luckett v. Nurse Hannah et al
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Jumarious Luckett
Defendant:
Nurse Hannah, Nurse Michelle, Liz DeLong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Jermaine Boykin, County Of Westchester, Lemar Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Fattouh et al
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Louis Smith
Defendant:
Ahmed M. Fattouh, Brandon Bentley, Jeffrey Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Luckett v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Keith Luckett
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Easman, Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY v. FREEDLE et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Defendant:
Roderic Freedle, Laurie C. Freedle, Tess Disman and others
Plaintiff:
Spinnaker Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
