Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jalieba v. Crim et al
as 5:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Paul Jalieba
Defendant:
Anthony Crim, Antonio Crim, K. K. Howle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddick v. Rose et al
as 7:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Rose, C/O T. Neece, C/O H. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERS, LLC v. M/V CHARLES L STRAIT et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
MERS, LLC
Defendant:
M/V CHARLES L STRAIT, M/V TATE OGLESBY, M/V BILLY STRAIT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
MERS, LLC v. WRBM, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02441
Plaintiff:
MERS, LLC
Defendant:
WRBM, LLC, M/V Charles L Strait, M/V Tate Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31342 Breach of Maritime Contract
Hammond-Williams et al v. Warner Music Group et al
as 1:2021cv01522
Defendant:
300 Entertainment, Atlantic Records and Warner Music Group
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M. Hammond-Williams and Henry I. Cisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond-Williams et al v. Fuchs et al
as 1:2021cv01121
Defendant:
Tuff-N-Rumble Management, Tuff City Records, Aaron Fuchs and others
Plaintiff:
Henry I. Cisco and Sabrina M. Hammond-Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Williams
as 5:2020cv06521
Plaintiff:
Tajiri Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
M. W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Williams et al
as 5:2020cv04802
Defendant:
City of San Mateo, San Mateo Police Department, M. W. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tajiri Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Houma Police Department, et al
as 2:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
Herman N-M-N Williams, IV and Herman Williams, IV
Defendant:
Joe Renfro, Caleb Mott, Chris Duplantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
