Cases 1 - 10 of 39
BOYLE v. IREX CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv04287
Plaintiff:
ANGELA M. BOYLE
Defendant:
IREX CORPORATION and ADVANTAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BOYLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv11065
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA M BOYLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. ( F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYLES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12154
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. BOYLES and MARLANA G. BOYLES
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. WALMART STORES EAST L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv09126
Plaintiff:
JAMAR K. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE (1-100) and ABC CORP (1-100) and WALMART STORES EAST L.P.
Arbitrator:
JOHN M. BOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LINNEN et al
as 2:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APRIL LINNEN, ZACHARY BOYLES, ANTHONY BOYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
JAMES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JAMES
Defendant:
BUSH, J. M. BOYLES and B. D. HEIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv10006
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BOYLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06172
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. BOYLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyles v. USA
as 2:2016cv00071
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arica M. Boyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Halford v. Boyle
as 2:2015cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ernest Louis Halford
Defendant:
M Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
