Cases 1 - 10 of 172
NetChoice, LLC v. Carr
as 1:2024cv02485
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayor and City Councile of Baltimore v. Walcott et al
as 1:2024cv01539
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Councile of Baltimore
Defendant:
Juiett P. Walcott, Rudy Walcott, Maryland E. Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Truth and Lending
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. CARR
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05746
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Oreginal M. Carr v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Oreginal M. Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Appeal, Inc. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
The Appeal, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Shawn Emmons, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
