Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hood v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Gary Hilton Hood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, G M Escobar, Fontana, California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESCOBAR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04355
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M ESCOBAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Defendant:
M Escobar, Pima, County of and Pima County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thoma v. Morrison et al
as 4:2019cv00472
Defendant:
M Escobar, Unknown Morrison, Mark Napier and others
Plaintiff:
Travis S Thoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jonathan Mendez-Escobar
as 19-40764
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN MENDEZ-ESCOBAR, also known as Jonathan M. Escobar, also known as Hemerson Mendez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-15142
Defendant / Appellee:
OLIVEIRA, A. PACILLAS, Correctional Counselor, A. LACKOVIC, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
High v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv00474
Defendant:
Unknown Lariza, Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee High, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, R. S. LAMBERT, Chief Deputy Warden, J. MAHONEY, Psy. D and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al
as 2:2015cv00541
Plaintiff:
Emmett Wade Christian
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, T King, M. Vela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
