Cases 21 - 30 of 500
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 23-6751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
G. KELLETT, G.E.O. Inc Unit Manager/Intelligence OFC., PAUL HAYMES, Chief of Special Investigations Unit, DIRECTOR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections and others
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
Wyatt v. State of Texas Government System et al
as 1:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr. and Lisa M Hill Wyatt
Defendant:
State of Texas Government System, G. Abbott, Mark Hollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Troy M. Hill
as 23-11756
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY M. HILL
Wyatt et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr, Joe M Balencia and Lisa M Hill Wyatt
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Greg Abbott, Mark Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Darcey et al
as 2:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Keion M Hill
Defendant:
Christopher Darcey and Nevada Hwy Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
(PC) Williams v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Y. Hirao et al v. Brian M. Hill et al
as 8:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Eugene Y. Hirao and Janet M. Hirao
Defendant:
Brian M. Hill, Lidiana Wijayanti and DOES 1 to 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
