Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Paul v. Pisaturo et al
as 1:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Paul
Defendant:
Laura A Pisaturo, Victoria M Almeida, Jorge C. Armesto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TODD v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS ET AL
as 5:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
JEROME EUGENE TODD
Defendant:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, MAURICE M PAUL, ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAMPS v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2016cv05416
Plaintiff:
CALVIN CAMPS
Defendant:
RAY C. HUGHES, M. PAUL, S. SUTTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grender v. Wall et al
as 1:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
William R Grender
Defendant:
Edward F Wall , Cathy A Jess, Brian Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Mukasey
as 2:2014cv01873
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
Michael B Mukasey, Eric H Holder, Ye-Ting Woo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TODD v. MUKASEY
as 5:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
JEROME EUGENE TODD
Defendant:
MICHAEL B MUKASEY, ERIC H HOLDER, YE TING WOO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rufus Rochell v. Maurice Paul, et al
as 14-12186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS C. ROCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MAURICE M. PAUL and LYNDIA BARRETT-SPEARS
ROCHELL v. PAUL, et al
as 1:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
RUFUS C ROCHELL
Defendant:
MAURICE M PAUL and LYNDIA P BARRETT-SPEARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torkelson, Jeffrey v. Paul, Shawn et al
as 3:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Torkelson
Defendant:
Shawn M. Paul, Nathan Walrath, Patrick Schilling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. Prince William County Adult Detention Ctr et al
as 1:2012cv00916
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Paul
Defendant:
Prince William County Adult Detention Ctr and Prince William County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
