Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Romero v. BronxCare Hospital
as 1:2023cv03708
Plaintiff:
Jesus M. Romero, Sr.
Defendant:
BronxCare Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Caballero v. Romero
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Carlos Caballero
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Romero, Carlos Villanueva, David Bruce Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAPETANIOS v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2021cv02843
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KAPETANIOS, SR.
Defendant:
JACKSON SHEPHERD, TONY KUMMER, ANDREW PLANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust v. Romero
as 3:2020cv05806
Defendant:
Janeth M. Romero and Janeth Romero Dejesus
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pena v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00771
Defendant:
Police Officer C Velazquez, E J Okon, lice Officer Richard A Pruger and others
Plaintiff:
Rocio Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Salgado et al
as 1:2020cv00770
Defendant:
H.G. Salgado, E J Okon, lice Officer Richard A Pruger and others
Plaintiff:
Police Officer E Leighton and Jorge Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association v. Romero
as 3:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Janeth M. Romero and Janeth Romero Dejesus
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
