Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant:
Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Alexander et al
as 0:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Mandy M. Alexander, Christy Kaster-Snow, Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Alexander
as 0:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Mandy M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Petlechkov v. Gilmer et al
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Dimitar Petlechkov
Defendant:
Joshua Paul Gilmer, Amar Balikai, Jessica M. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miyo Alexander v. State of Minnesota
as 24-1145
Petitioner:
Miyo M. Alexander
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Smith v. Perkins et al
as 2:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith
Defendant:
Richard Perkins, Todd L. Moody and Christina M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Alexander v. Herman et al
as 7:2023cv09312
Defendant:
Veral Corp. and Harrison A. Herman
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
KIM ALEXANDER and HARRISON A HERMAN
Plaintiff:
Kim M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tn Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Drake v. Amerisure Partners Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01916
Plaintiff:
M Alexander Drake
Defendant:
Amerisure Partners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
