Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Downey v. South Central Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2013cv23595
Plaintiff:
James Downey
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail Authority , Stephen C. Tucker , Mark Jerrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. Jackson v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-20488
Petitioner - Appellant:
M. B. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Vincent Price McCowan v. B Hedrick et al
as 2:2013cv05943
Respondent:
Captain M B Atchley, Officer A Avalos, Nurse Divina Druz and others
Petitioner:
Vincent Price McCowan
Vincent Price McCowan v. B Hedrick et al
as 2:2013cv05969
Defendant:
M B Atchley, Officer A Avalos, Sgt Black and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Price McCowan
Chandler v. Chamber
as 3:2012cv01419
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
M. B. Chamber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Amicus - Appellee:
N. G. BARTLEY
Steven Tarpley v. J. Stouffer
as 11-7498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN E. TARPLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, FREDERICK NASTRI, BOBBY SHEARIN and others
Defendant:
CHARLENE HETTY TRENUM and ISAIS TESSEMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chiera v. Buss et al
as 3:2011cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chiera
Defendant:
Edwin G. Buss, Timothy Cannon, Robert S. Klienhans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Tarpley v. Charlene Trenum
as 11-6767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN E. TARPLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLENE HETTY TRENUM and ISAIS TESSEMA
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, DAVID BARTHALOW, FREDERICK NASTRI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
