Cases 71 - 80 of 459
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. McCray-Bey et al
as 1:2021cv02656
Defendant:
Primerica Life Insurance Company, Shante McCray-Bey, Shante Natasha Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shikeb Saddozai v. M. Atchley
as 21-16689
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Respondent / Appellee:
M. B. ATCHLEY
Remedio v. Noble Drilling U S L L C et al
as 6:2021cv03527
Plaintiff:
Yury Remedio
Defendant:
Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC, Noble Drilling Services, Inc., Noble Drilling Holding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUIZ v. ROYAL MISS BELMAR, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv17165
Plaintiff:
NELSON RUIZ
Defendant:
ROYAL MISS BELMAR, LLC, MISS BELMAR ROYAL, LLC, SS MISS BELMAR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
RUIZ v. Royal Miss Belmar, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv17165
Plaintiff:
NELSON RUIZ
Defendant:
Royal Miss Belmar, LLC, Miss Belmar Royal, LLC, SS Miss Belmar, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shikeb Saddozai v. A. Carwithen, et al
as 21-16284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
M. B. ATCHLEY, Warden, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CONTROL TOWER OFFICER and others
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35371
Plaintiff:
OMTEME M B SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2021cv06118
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
