Cases 1 - 10 of 48
(PC) Moten v. Vieth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Vieth, Ochoa, Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martin J. Walsh v. Sonic Excellence et al
as 8:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Sonic Excellence, Sonic Excellence 401k Plan and Albert M. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
(PC)Ruiz v. Stane et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
M. Stane, M. Espinoza, E. Ruelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Ruiz v. Stane et al
as 1:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
M. Stane, M. Espinoza, E. Ruelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Federal Bureau of Investigatio
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan M. Espinoza
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and Central Intelligence Agency, Officer of Equal Employment Opportunity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Espinoza v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2021cv04749
Plaintiff:
Bryan M. Espinoza
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberto Amaya-Palacios v. William Barr
as 20-71883
Petitioner:
ROBERTO AMAYA-PALACIOS, AKA Roberto Amaya, AKA Roberto Amya, AKA Jose M. Espinoza, AKA Roberto Palacios Amaya
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Espinoza #323955 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01014
Defendant:
David Shinn and Unknown Carr
Plaintiff:
Francisco M Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
