Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Stefanie M. Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Union Home Mortgage Corp. v. Everett Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Union Home Mortgage Corp.
Defendant:
Everett Financial Inc. doing business as Supreme Lending, Andrew Kyle Tuttle, James M. Fisher and others
Counter Claimant:
Kathryn Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, RICKY MAZINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Nagle
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Devin M. Fisher
Defendant:
John J. Nagle, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Galbrouth et al
as 1:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Devin M. Fisher
Defendant:
Daniel Galbrouth and Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06872
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. FISHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HASPEL v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HASPEL
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, P JANSEN, N HESSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
ALANA PAYTON, COLE M. RADICIC, MATTHEW WHELIHAN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fisher v. Schrorder
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Devin M. Fisher
Defendant:
Samantha Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
