Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hansen v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02808
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hansen
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Christopher Catechis, Jason Huerta and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
AS et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2023cv05621
Plaintiff:
AS and CJ
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Tasha Barkley, Lakisha M Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martignetti et al v. City of Cambridge
as 1:2018cv10980
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Martignetti , David G. Albert , Keith Albert and others
Defendant:
City of Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Teresamingo Gamble v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 16-11605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESAMINGO M. GAMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Gamble v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
Teresamingo M. Gamble
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis v. Gamble et al
as 3:2013cv00790
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Davis
Defendant:
M. Gamble, H. Prince and Clay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teresamingo Gamble v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 12-10160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESAMINGO M. GAMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Gamble v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2010cv03530
Plaintiff:
Teresamingo M. Gamble
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Antonio Gamble
as 10-1371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO M. GAMBLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
