Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Sorenson Forensics v. Hartman et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Sorenson Forensics
Defendant:
Kent M Hartman, Jami K Hartman and Genetic Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Hartman v. US
as 22-1955
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOROTHY M. HARTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CARPENTER v. HARTMAN
as 3:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
JACK M. HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jurado R. Reese v. Mel Red Recana et al
as 2:2021cv03633
Defendant:
Amrita B Walgampaya, Nikki Trumbo, Judge Gregory Keosian and others
Plaintiff:
Jurado R. Reese, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. US
as 21-1535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOROTHY M. HARTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele et al v. Blenz et al
as 2:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Steele, N. R. H., Jerry C Steele, II and others
Defendant:
John A Blenz, Everett's Inc., Flint Hills Trucking, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTMAN v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv10636
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY M HARTMAN
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv01864
Defendant:
K. Knutson, State of Minnesota, N. Pelosi and others
Plaintiff:
Howard G Jackson and Howard G. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maroney v. Cheetah Transportation Systems, LP et al
as 4:2018cv02591
Defendant:
Cheetah Management, LLC, Edward Hartman, IV, Darryl Hymel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Maroney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
