Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Hughes v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Beverly M. Hughes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Ledesma v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11432
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ledesma
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Clark, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes (ID 105577) v. McClain
as 5:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Christopher McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farida Rahman v. Richard Hughes, III
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
FARIDA B. RAHMAN
Defendant:
RICHARD M. HUGHES, III
Hughes v. Town of Amherst et al
as 1:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Danielle M Hughes
Defendant:
Town of Amherst, Town of Amherst Police Department, P.O./Det Edwin C. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS M HUGHES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hughes et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02067
Plaintiff:
James M. Hughes and Syngenta AG
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10879
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HUGHES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rahman v. Hughes
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Richard M. Hughes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
