Cases 41 - 50 of 186
BORTOLOTTI v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv06137
Petitioner:
JAMES BORTOLOTTI
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS, LLP et al v. Knight et al
as 3:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS,LLP, John M. Rolleri, Ryan C. Sheppard and others
Defendant:
Michael J. Knight and Darlene M. Knight
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
MARTINEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv06021
Petitioner:
RICHARD MARTINEZ
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KOSHKIN v. PETERS et al
as 1:2022cv06018
Petitioner:
OLEG KOSHKIN
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keith KnightIn re: Keith Knight
as 22-2828
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH M. KNIGHT, a/k/a Moon Starcloud
Respondent:
JILL SPYKER, Deputy Superintendent, SGT. REIHART, Block Sergeant, JOHN PAPOTTO, Former Counselor and others
WAYS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02843
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVIE M. KNIGHT and JOSE CUEVAS, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WAYS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2022cv05439
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYS
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT and JOSE CUEVAS, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knight v. Douglas County Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight
Defendant:
Douglas County Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Huff
as 1:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ashli M Knight
Defendant:
Jimmy S Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knight v. City of Omaha
as 8:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight Bey D.M.
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
