Cases 21 - 30 of 183
Morgan v. Poorman et al
as 8:2022cv02749
Plaintiff:
Tyrone M. Morgan
Defendant:
Doctor Poorman, Adam Pylitt and Frank Migiliore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
Lori M Morgan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morgan v. Helder et al
as 5:2022cv05183
Plaintiff:
Kristopher M. Morgan
Defendant:
Tim Helder, County Judge Woods, Governer Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillan v. Thompson
as 22-1511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benjamin McMillan, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. T. Thompson, C.O. M. Morgan, C.O. J. Long and others
Morgan v. Hartman et al
as 1:2022cv03501
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Morgan
Defendant:
Scott Hartman, Mario Monello, Vincent Puma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Casby v. McConnell et al
as 1:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby
Defendant:
Warden McConnell, HIPPA Ceo, M Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casby v. McConnell et al
as 1:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby and Original Juice Mann
Defendant:
Warden McConnell, Dr King, Dr Humi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morgan v. Social Security Administration Acting Commissioner
as 0:2022cv00031
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Acting Commissioner and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Morgan and Rose M Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SPIVEY v. SCHIOFMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C E RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Rothe et al
as 5:2021cv05153
Plaintiff:
Kristopher M. Morgan
Defendant:
Theresa Rothe, John Beckham, Nurse Jolana Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
