Cases 1 - 10 of 29
MAHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06462
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M MAHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Putman v. Phillips et al
as 6:2023cv06049
Plaintiff:
Johnanthony Ray Putman
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Fred Phillips, Corporal Passmore, Dr. Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Maher
as 23-6181
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN M. MAHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nunnelle v. Elkin et al
as 6:2022cv06018
Plaintiff:
Lucas Linden Nunnelle
Defendant:
Dr. Darrell Elkin, Nurse Kasandra Hutts, Guard M. Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noland v. World Bank et al
as 4:2020cv00918
Defendant:
Katie L. Smith, World Bank, Joseph H. Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Noland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONRAD v. BEDROSIAN et al
as 1:2019cv01928
Defendant:
Jeffrey Farber, David Drabik, John Kozlowski and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. CONRAD
Nominal Defendant:
Lannett Company Inc.
Castrodale et al v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01746
Defendant:
Jeffrey Farber, Paul Taveira, Timothy C. Crew and others
Nominal Defendant:
Lannett Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sykes and Michael Castrodale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whatley v. Pollard, et al
as 2:2019cv01173
Plaintiff:
Antonio Whatley
Defendant:
Caleb M Zitek, Jane Doe, Ms. Jandrain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONRAD v. BEDROSIAN et al
as 2:2019cv03197
Defendant:
JEFFREY FARBER, DAVID DRABIK, JOHN KOZLOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. CONRAD
Nominal Defendant:
LANNETT COMPANY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
