Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Rosa (PS) v. Habib
as 1:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
John M Rosa
Defendant:
Habib
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa (PS) v. Sam et al
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
John M Rosa and John Michael Rosa
Defendant:
Sam, Mckayla, Shawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa (PS) v. Ziolkowski et al
as 1:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
John M Rosa
Defendant:
Brian Ziolkowski, Pueblo County Detention Center, Pueblo County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Rosas
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Irene M. Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Rios v. Rosas et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
M. Rosas, S. Fisher, A. Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rosas et al
as 5:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
M. Rosas, S. Fisher, A. Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas Rojas v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09771
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Rosas Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
