Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05952
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01646
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barkley v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2026cv06612
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Barkley
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Greg Ruiz, Kenneth D McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03411
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz v. Weeks Marine
as 26-30548
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ruiz
Defendant:
Weeks Marine, Incorporated
Cross-Defendant:
E&E Machine Shop and Services, L.L.C.
Ruiz v. State of New York Mortgage Agency
as 26-2565
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK MORTGAGE AGENCY, SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ, AND HERTZEL, LLP, M&T BANK CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05896
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
