Cases 1 - 10 of 26
KAMIES et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
ALI A. KAMIES and SHARON M. WINN KAMIES
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Winn v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Dianne M Winn
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WINN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21660
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB M WINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Horne, et al v. Sheila Polk
as 19-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS CHARLES HORNE, Attorney General and KATHLEEN M WINN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHEILA SULLIVAN POLK, in her official capacity as the Yavapai County Attorney
Thomas Horne, et al v. Sheila Polk
as 19-15943
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KATHLEEN M WINN and THOMAS CHARLES HORNE, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
SHEILA SULLIVAN POLK, in her official capacity as the Yavapai County Attorney
Horne et al v. Polk
as 3:2018cv08010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Horne and Kathleen M Winn
Defendant:
Sheila Sullivan Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Grady, Sr. v. Nathon Bennett, et al
as 17-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. GRADY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHON BENNETT, Warehouse Supervisor, SHAWN WHITECOTTON, Unicor Plant Manager, M. WINN, Warehouse Manager and others
Kevin L. Grady, Sr. v. Nathon Bennett, et al
as 17-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. GRADY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHON BENNETT, SHAWN WHITECOTTON, M. WINN and others
Winn v. USA
as 5:2017cv00053
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dianne M Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Grady, Sr. v. Bennett et al
as 3:2016cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Grady, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathon Bennett, Shawn Whitecotton, M. Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
