Cases 1 - 10 of 71
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant:
Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walton et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv04843
Plaintiff:
Denisha Walton, Justin Walton and Denisha M Walton
Defendant:
Kee Ana Smith, Wendy Lee Lowinger, Monica Wiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Hester v. Charlotte Burrows, et al
as 22-5312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Hester
Defendant / Appellee:
Charlotte A. Burrows, Chair, Janet Dhillon, Commissioner, Victoria Ann Lipnic, Commissioner and others
Devontea Walton v. Pamela Pepper
as 22-2713
Petitioner:
DEVONTEA M. WALTON
Respondent:
PAMELA PEPPER
Marcus WaltonIn re: Marcus Walton
as 22-2268
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS M. WALTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Walton v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01272
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Walton
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALTON v. SCI FRACKVILLE
as 2:2022cv01896
Petitioner:
MARCUS M. WALTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI FRACKVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M. Walton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35429
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN M WALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HESTER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
DONALD C. MCCORMICK, CARLTON M. HADDEN, BRAD BAUDEK and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
