Cases 11 - 20 of 25
WILSON v. Coastline Management Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv21378
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. WILSON
Defendant:
Coastline Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Kenneth Greene v. Carolyn Colvin
as 15-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. GREENE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration, BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, United States Senator, ELIJAH CUMMINGS, Congressman and others
Greene v. Colvin et al
as 1:2015cv01183
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Greene
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Barbara A. Mikulski, Elijah Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Wilson et al v. PNK (River City), LLC.
as 4:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Wilson , Darren Metzger and Charles Patterson
Defendant:
PNK (River City), LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Wilson v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Wilson
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Wilson v. Standard Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Donna M Wilson
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BANKS et al v. RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BANKS and JONICE M. WILSON
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stoyanov v. Mabus et al
as 1:2013cv00141
Plaintiff:
Yuri J. Stoyanov
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, James H. King, Wayne Weikert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stoyanov v. Mabus et al
as 1:2013cv00142
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, James King, Kevin M. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Yuri J. Stoyanov
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stoyanov v. Mabus et al
as 1:2012cv02458
Plaintiff:
Yuri J. Stoyanov
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Gary M. Jebsen, Garth Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
