Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rupp v. Younis et al
as 9:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Peter Rupp
Defendant:
ASAT M.J. Younis, SGT R.B. Howard, SGT Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDS v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL E. RICHARDS
Defendant:
M.J. EDWARDS, DR. BAIRD, NURSE SUPERVISOR LOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Blackmon et al
as 7:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ferguson
Defendant:
Lt. Blackmon, M.J. Gilcrest, Jason Rason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowder v. Bayless
as 3:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Danny B. Crowder, Jr.
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
Steve M. Casaus and Unknown Persons
Respondent:
M.J. Beard
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
