Cases 1 - 6 of 6
COFFIN v. AMETEK INC et al
as 2:2018cv00472
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INC, BATH IRON WORKS, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR COFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffin v. Ametek Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00348
Defendant:
Avco Corporation, R.W. BECKETT COMPANY, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Coffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Peterson v. Pan Am Railways et al
as 1:2012cv01857
Plaintiff:
Kurt E. Peterson
Defendant:
Pan Am Railways, Pan Am Southern, Boston & Maine Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
First Union Rail Corporation v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company et al
as 3:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
First Union Rail Corporation
Defendant:
Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Portland Terminal Company, Maine Central Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC et al
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Defendant:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC , MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY and UGI UTILITIES INC
Counter_claimant:
UGI UTILITIES INC , PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR , NORMAN HEITMANN and EDWARD BARRETT
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
BOIVIN et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv63896
Plaintiff:
MAYNARD P. BOIVIN and JENNIE BOIVIN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CLIFTON ASSOCIATES INC, GARLOCK INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE COPR ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
