Cases 41 - 50 of 429
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 22-56201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC RAY MALONE and ERIC MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES
Malone v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08453
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Malone
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward-Malone v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00549
Petitioner:
Christopher J Ward-Malone
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joseph Andrew Perez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv08643
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Perez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva, Bobby Wynche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Domonic Malone v. Brian Williams, et al
as 22-16671
Petitioner:
DOMONIC RONALDO MALONE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Townsel v. Bowman et al
as 4:2022cv05122
Plaintiff:
Jerry U Townsel
Defendant:
Cheryle Strange, Christopher C Bowman, Christopher M Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wayne Johnson v. Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder, et al
as 22-16290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE JOHNSON, Esquire
Defendant / Appellee:
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK RECORDER, DEBORAH COOPER, PATRICIA D. MALONE, Court Reporter and others
Bahar Mikhak v. University of Phoenix, Inc., et al
as 22-16201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHAR MIKHAK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., an Arizona corporation, WILLIAM J. PEPICELLO, President, RYAN BERMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
