Cases 11 - 20 of 44
COMBS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DAVID MANAHANE COMBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, et al.
as 7:2020cv00121
Defendant:
BILLY J WHEELER, HUDSON DURDEN, TIM CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ARNELO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S. Patrick Mendel, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 19-17073
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, THOMAS COLOPY, DOUGLAS O'CONNOR and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BARNES v. VALDOSTA GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00092
Defendant:
MARK BURKHART, VALDOSTA GEORGIA, LESLIE MANAHAN and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manahan v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00788
Plaintiff:
Lisa Manahan
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Manahan v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13664
Plaintiff:
Anna C. Manahan
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nugent v. Sessions
as 17-3172
Petitioner:
Byron Manahan Nugent
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Douglas O'Connor, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 17-16863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
