Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Spencer et al v. Figueroa et al
as 1:2023cv04700
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Spencer, Amaria Spencer and Anjeleah Tellis
Defendant:
Manuel Figueroa, Mario Tapia, Marcy Gougis-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FIGUEROA-RIVERA v. JONES
as 5:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
ERIC MANUEL FIGUEROA-RIVERA
Defendant:
D JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose FigueroaIn re: Jose Figueroa
as 23-12595
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Figueroa Ramos v. Kijakaz
as 3:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Luis M Figueroa-Ramos and Luis Manuel Figueroa Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolol Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakaz
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Jose Figueroa v. USA
as 23-11710
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Elmer Figueroa-Garcia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1249
Petitioner:
ELMER MANUEL FIGUEROA-GARCIA and EDYN JEOVANNY GARCIA-FIGUEROA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Figueroa-Adorno v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA-ADORNO
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jose Figueroa
as 23-10316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL FIGUEROA
Manuel Figueroa v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2021cv07397
Plaintiff:
MANUEL FIGUEROA
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Gaud v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09312
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gaud
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Cari M. Dominguez, Roberta Herman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
