Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Ngo v. Romero, et al.
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Chi Thanh Ngo
Defendant:
Manuel Romero, Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacazuca v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 5:2023cv05636
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Romero Pacazuca
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States v. Romero-Gallardo
as 23-4143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL ROMERO-GALLARDO
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07707
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Manuel Romero
Defendant:
United States of America and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Wrobel v. City of Santa Fe et al
as 1:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wrobel
Defendant:
City of Santa Fe, City of Santa Fe Police Department, Alan Webber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Parada v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Romero Parada
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States v. Manuel Flores
as 22-1197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel Romero Flores
United States of America v. Cambrelen (Rivera)
as 21-2871
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ryan Cambrelen, AKA Bolo, Joel Vasquez, Francisco Sepeda, AKA Shorty, AKA Eddie Brown, AKA Fransizco Sepeda and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Alberto Rivera, AKA Alberto, AKA Jose A Rivera
In re: Jose Romero-Parada
as 21-3473
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE MANUEL ROMERO-PARADA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
