Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
George v. Wood et al
as 1:2023cv00622
Petitioner:
Peyton George
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Wood, Deputy Gregory Phipps, Lieutenant Michael Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Whitener, Jr. v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Ronald Whitener, Jr.
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Department, BPD GTTF, Sgt. Wayne Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03298
Petitioner:
MARCUS TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marcus Taylor v. John Yates
as 23-1479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates
Adams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
Robert Tyrone Adams
Defendant:
Marcus Taylor and Shkeitha Swafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. TA Operating, LLC
as 2:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Marcus Taylor
Defendant:
TA Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022at00395
Defendant:
Marcus Taylor and TA Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Taylor v. TA Operating, LLC
as 1:2022at00396
Defendant:
Marcus Taylor and TA Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Marcus Taylor v. United States, et al
as 21-3865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, DeWayne Hendrix, in his capacity as Warden of Forrest City and Michael D. Carvajal, in his capacity as Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
