Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gold Creek Foods, LLC et al v. City of Dawsonville, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gold Creek Foods, LLC and Gold Creek Processing, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dawsonville, Georgia, John Walden, Caleb Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
Mark French v. Michael Bivens
as 22-6137
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK FRENCH
Respondent / Appellee:
OFFICER MICHAEL BIVENS and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
French v. Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02736
Petitioner:
Mark French
Respondent:
Officer Michael Bivens and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRENCH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14035
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 21-3046
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BOWLING, HERMAN JONES, ROBERT WARE and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, ROBERT W. DIERKS, BRIAN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Dartez v. French, et al
as 21-3045
Defendant:
RICK PETERS, COLBY J. MARKHAM, CHRISTOPHER P. MAI and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN JOHNSON, MARK FRENCH, JOSEPH EHRLICH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Mark French v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 20-6780
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP, JR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK FRENCH
FRENCH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11511
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KADEEM MARK FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
