Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Simmons Bank v. Cinch Energy Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Simmons Bank
Defendant:
Cinch Energy Services, LLC, Mark Lopez and Frank T Jr. Shumate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Friddle v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Danny Friddle
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Todd Thomas, M Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ramon Lupercio v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-16127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MARK LOPEZ, Detective, JOHN P. MORAN and others
(PC) Lupercio v. The People of the State of CA et al
as 1:2021cv01257
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Mark Lopez, Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lupercio v. The People of the State of CA et al
as 2:2021cv01448
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Mark Lopez, Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32593
Plaintiff:
MARK LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2021cv02397
Defendant:
Mark Lopez, Kevin To, Steven Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Lupercio v. Lopez et al
as 1:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Mark Lopez and Grimes
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lupercio v. Lopez et al
as 4:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Mark Lopez and Grimes
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89868
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
