Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Neuman v. Mercer County, WV Prosecuting Attorney's Office
as 1:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Neuman
Defendant:
Mercer County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gabbidon v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00828
Plaintiff:
Paulette Gabbidon and Paulette Hibbert
Defendant:
David R. Wilson, Gina Honaker, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Mark S. Inch, B. Von Blankensee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Mark S. Inch, B. Von Blankensee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nevman v. West Virginia Parole Board et al
as 3:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Nevman
Defendant:
West Virginia Parole Board and West Virginia Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 3:2015cv14127
Plaintiff:
William Brumfield
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. , John K. Kessinger, Jane S. McElreath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10996
Plaintiff:
Ann L. Green and Mark S. Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Wood
as 5:2014mc00165
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark S. Wood
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Wood
as 5:2014cv26946
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark S. Wood
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Rounds et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08496
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rounds and Mark S. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
