Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brooks et al v. R&B Corporation of Virginia
as 4:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mary Brooks and Michele Van Moppes
Defendant:
R&B Corporation of Virginia doing business as Credit Control Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In re R&B Corporation of Virginia d/b/a Credit Control Corporation, Data Security Breach Litigation
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
MERRETTE BLAKE
Defendant:
R&B CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA d/b/a CREDIT CONTROL CORPORATION
Consolidated Defendant:
R&B Corporation of Virginia doing business as Credit Control Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Veronica Huamani, Jason Powers, Douglas Monson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Brooks et al v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03561
Plaintiff:
Charles Brooks , Mary Brooks , Constance Leppard and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Segalilt Siegel et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02296
Plaintiff:
Segalilt Siegel , Susan Hernandez , Laurel Herring and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Brooks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00640
Plaintiff:
Mary Brooks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Rose Brook
as 10-5127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSE MARY BROOKS, Rosie Brooks
Brooks v. USA
as 5:2010cv00159
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rose Mary Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brooks v. Arlington County Policy Department et al
as 1:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Helen Marie Brooks
Defendant:
Arlington County Policy Department and Police Officer Measel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
