Cases 31 - 40 of 77
United States of America v. Adams et al
as 5:2017cv04094
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Derek D. Adams, Abbigale Marie Cox, Cloud County, Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sangimino et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01488
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Sangimino , Ananhi Gonzalez , Michelle Scheifen and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer HealthCare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. Dorroh
as 5:2016cv01395
Plaintiff:
Patti Marie Cox
Defendant:
Katherine C Dorroh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Cartagena-Navarro et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Juan Cartagena-Navarro, Shylene Marie Cox-Santiago and Conjugal Partnership Cartagena-Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cox v. FMK Metal LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03624
Plaintiff:
Mary Cox
Defendant:
FMK Metal LLC and Michael Melnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:15-cv-04583
Plaintiff:
MARY COX
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION , BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
COX v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv04583
Plaintiff:
MARY COX
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12234
Plaintiff:
Mary Cox
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
