Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BUTLER-SISNROY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv02325
Plaintiff:
MARY E. BUTLER-SISNROY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Wicks, et al v. Dudley Anderson, et al
as 14-4795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN WICKS, CAROLINE WICKS, GEORGE BIDLESPACHER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DUDLEY N. ANDERSON, KEVIN WAY, ROBIN A. READ and others
Wicks et al v. Anderson et al
as 4:2014cv00143
Plaintiff:
Steven Wicks , Caroline Wicks , George Bidlespacher and others
Defendant:
Dudley N. Anderson , Kevin Way , Robin A. Read and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-30757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Akhi Muhammad v. Gregory Weis, et al
as 11-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHI R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY T. WEIS, W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-11401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Akhi Muhammad v. Gregory Weis, et al
as 09-4311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHI R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY, FRANK M. GIANOLA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv07447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
