Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Muhammad v. LOreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv11146
Plaintiff:
Maryam Muhammad
Defendant:
LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shekar v. Brooks et al
as 1:2025cv09251
Defendant:
James Adolph Wright, Lloyd James Brooks, MICHAEL CROWE and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Shekar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roger Shekar v. Lloyd Brooks, et al
as 25-2422
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Defendant:
LLOYD JAMES BROOKS, MICHAEL CROWE, PETER SULLIVAN and others
SHEKAR v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2025cv03691
Defendant:
JAMES ADOLPH WRIGHT, LLOYD JAMES BROOKS, MICHAEL CROWE and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weeks v. Grady et al
as 1:2018cv01373
Plaintiff:
Kevin Melvin Weeks
Defendant:
Robert C. Grady, Maryam Muhammad, Theodore Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks v. Grady et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kevin Melvin Weeks
Defendant:
Robert C. Grady, Maryam Muhammad, Theodore Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
