Cases 1 - 10 of 602
Clasberry v. Matlock et al
as 1:2024cv12711
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Y Schmitt, A Matlock and others
Plaintiff:
Jawaun Clasberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlock et al v. Singh, et al
as 6:2024cv01835
Defendant:
Amarjit Singh and JP Carrier, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brittany Miller and Dustin Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Doe v. Matlock et al
as 3:2024cv00849
Defendant:
John N. Mack and David N. Matlock
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carithers et al v. Google LLC
as 5:2024cv06708
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Barbour, Felicia Ritchie, Grant Kepner and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Coleman, Sidney v. Barrett, Kalvin et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Defendant:
Sgt. M. Conners, John Doe, Kalvin D. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lee Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024mc51017
Defendant:
Bennie Campbell and David Matlock
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Latrice Winfrey-Campbell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Matlock et al v. Wright et al
as 5:2024cv00954
Defendant:
Fish4Him Entertainment, LLC, Marsha A. Wright and Eric S. Wright
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Dann Matlock and Joseph Edward Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Matlock v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
Jeremy Matlock
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Black et al
as 4:2024cv04083
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Cullen Matlock, Correctional Officer Shane Berryman, Sheriff Jeff Black and others
Plaintiff:
Learbury Shundrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlock v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Behanzin Matlock
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
