Cases 1 - 10 of 325
AGANAN et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2023cv21410
Plaintiff:
RIZZA JANE GUANAO AGANAN, ALBERT BOAMPONG, HECTOR GARCIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JOHN TSOUKARIS, MATTHEW ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.I.I.L. et al v. Sessions et al
as 4:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
A.I.I.L., L.L.H.O., J.L.V.A. and others
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Gene Hamilton, John F Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Defendant:
JUDGE LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
Me et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv19396
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and JON ROE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DHS, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Me et al v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv05871
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and Jon Roe
Defendant:
United States, U.S. DHS, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nora Phillips, et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Protec, et al
as 21-55768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORA PHILLIPS, ERIKA PINHEIRO and NATHANIEL DENNISON
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, MARK MORGAN, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff:
J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Franco v. Johnson
as 21-10141
Respondent / Appellee:
Henry Lucero, Executive Associate Director for the Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations for the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcus Franco
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
