Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Yolanda Gill v. Dominique Ross, et al
as 25-2690
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA S. GILL
Defendant:
DOMINIQUE ROSS, CHERYL INGRAM, MATTHEW INGRAM and others
Gill v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv12761
Defendant:
Arlette Porter, Dominique Ross, Cook County Government and others
Plaintiff:
Yolanda S. Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INGRAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25532
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW INGRAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sullivan v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2019cv00995
Defendant:
Matthew Ingram, David Kovachevich, Dr. Michael Seale and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Andrew Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor et al v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03190
Plaintiff:
Rachel O'Connor, David Cruz and Matthew Ingram
Defendant:
Bavarian Motor Works and BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Ingram v. Weiss-Rohlig USA LLC
as 1:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ingram
Defendant:
Weiss-Rohlig USA LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Labor
Ingram et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Wanda Ingram and Matthew Ingram
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
INGRAM v. CAMDEN COUNTY INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2013cv00047
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY INCORPORATED, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
