Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Martinez et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv11416
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martinez, Victor Martinez, James Mason and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McCoy et al v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Defendant:
Mathew Clifford and Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Ryan Matthew McCoy and Garrett Michael McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03577
Defendant:
Esther Laborador, Willie Davis, Director Stacy Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCoy v. USA
as 1:2023cv04651
Petitioner:
Matthew McCoy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McCoy v. Tewalt
as 1:2022cv00267
Petitioner:
Matthew McCoy
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Matthew McCoy
as 21-3895
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew McCoy
McCoy et al v. Gordils et al
as 1:2021cv04940
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCOY, MATTHEW MCCOY and DONALD JESSE ANDRADE
Defendant:
P.O. JOEL GORDILS #8451, P.O. JOHN DOE, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv05246
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93744
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
