Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McCoy v. USA
as 1:2023cv04651
Petitioner:
Matthew McCoy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McCoy v. Tewalt
as 1:2022cv00267
Petitioner:
Matthew McCoy
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Matthew McCoy
as 21-3895
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew McCoy
McCoy et al v. Gordils et al
as 1:2021cv04940
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCOY, MATTHEW MCCOY and DONALD JESSE ANDRADE
Defendant:
P.O. JOEL GORDILS #8451, P.O. JOHN DOE, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv05246
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCOY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93744
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. Houston, et al
as 20-2002
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN HOUSTON, in his individual capacity, PETE GOLDEN, in his individual capacity, RUDY MORA, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW MCCOY
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Michael Wenesowicz, Superintendent Marsh, John E. Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Marti
as 6:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Maxey
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy Marti and Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Intervenor:
CompSource Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
