Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Sawyer et al v. Central Oregon Community College et al
as 6:2017cv01150
Defendant:
James Bennett, Central Oregon Community College, Edwin E. Lara and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kaylee A. Sawyer, Crystal Sawyer, Jamie Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Houston, et al
as 1:2016cv01377
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCoy
Defendant:
Dan Houston , Manuel Gonzales , Rudy Mora and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2016cv01726
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jack Edwards
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Becker Bachic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2015cv02174
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, Debra Rand, Marcia Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Religious Accomodation Committ, et al
as 15-3429
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY and CHARLES KENNEDY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION COMMITTEE, JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN K. MURRAY, Regional Deputy Secretary of Bellefonte, PA SCI - Benner Twp and others
Defendant:
VINCENT MOONEY, MICHAEL MILLER, ANTHONY LUSCAVAGE and others
Bailey v. Religious Accomodation Committe, et al.
as 3:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E Wezel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinds et al v. The City Of New York City et al
as 1:2012cv09403
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Hinds and Kristal Ruiz
Defendant:
The City Of New York City , Matthew McCoy, Matthew Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Terry et al
as 1:2007cv00699
Plaintiff:
Dean R. Myers
Defendant:
Joseph Terry and Matthew McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
