Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Norman v. Fragrancex.com Inc.
as 2:2025cv00919
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Fragrancex.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
NORMAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00205
Defendant:
DURREGAR, TRICIA PRETORIUS, HEATHER RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30413
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lamar v. Boles et al
as 3:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mary Lamar
Defendant:
Russell Boles, Matthew Norman and Darren Rider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10050
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14451
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN COOK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78468
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02051
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03069
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES, JORDAN BLACKBURN, RICARDO DIXON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
