Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,504
Brule v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: Darrell Maurice Brule
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Carter v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff: T'von Maurice Carter
Defendant: Sheriff Antoinette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Linder v. Donald Brown
as 24-6366
Plaintiff: KEVIN MAURICE LINDER
Defendant: DONALD G. BROWN, Sheriff of Catawba County, DEPUTY LUNA, DEPUTY COOK and others
Pittman III v. Leidos, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff: Milford Maurice Pittman III
Defendant: Leidos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Green v. State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: Damion Dante Maurice Green
Defendant: State of West Virginia, Brandi Otey, Raliegh County Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Cross et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff: Lavonne Maurice Freeman
Defendant: Aaron Cross, D. Mears, W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00374
Petitioner: Marvin Maurice Williams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Francis v. Sandoval
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff: David Francis
Defendant: Maurice Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Shuron Barksdale v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6289
Petitioner: SHURON MAURICE BARKSDALE
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Department of Corrections
DODSON et al v. WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: JOHN DODSON, SCOTT TURNER, JOSEPH GALLAGHER and others
Defendant: WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and JONATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?