Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Davis v. Laffrey et al
as 2:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maurice Davis
Defendant:
Brian Laffrey, Piper Sessions, Rachel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Uddin
as 2:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Maurice Davis, Maurice Daronte Davis and Maurice Daronte Davis Rogers
Defendant:
Meskath Vddin and Meskath Uddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00226
Petitioner:
Antoine Maurice Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00222
Petitioner:
Antoine Maurice Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dones et al v. N.Y.C.D.O.C.S. Comm. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2017cv06038
Plaintiff:
Aramis Dones, David Weber, Robert Elliot and others
Defendant:
N.Y.C.D.O.C.S. Comm. John/Jane Doe, Kisa Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Brum et al
as 3:2017cv00622
Petitioner:
Maurice Davis
Respondent:
Tracy Brum and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv01478
Petitioner:
Maurice Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2016cv00770
Petitioner:
MAURICE DAVIS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. DAY et al
as 2:2015cv01594
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MAURICE DAVIS
Defendant:
DAY, KAMINSKY, CHRISTIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davy v. United States Marshal et al
as 3:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Maurice Davy
Defendant:
United States Marshal, La Marque Police Dept., Galveston County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
